Monday, February 27, 2012

All But My Life Vs. Conflict in Syria

http://articles.cnn.com/2012-02-23/world/world_syria-intervention_1_syrian-opposition-bashar-syrian-regime?_s=PM:WORLD


This article is about how in Syria, people are getting killed and feeling helpless yet the world isn't doing much to help. Some consider this conflict a genocide. The article's title tells the opinion of many Syrians; The title reads, "Why the World isn't Intervening in Syria." The title explains how the people for Syria feel, which explains why the audience was meant to be the rest of the world. The article was meant to inform the world about the situation in Syria and try to persuade them to try and help. The article claims that the rest of the world is sitting back and watching Syria fall along with its people.  In the article it says, "What is the world waiting for. For us to die of hunger and fear?" This shows that the people of Syria think the rest of the world don;t care about them and are going to let them die. One issue here is the international community doesn't know what to do to stop the conflict, and they can;t agree on whether or not to intervene in the first place. Also in the article is, "The Chinese and Russians are dead set against (intervention)" showing why the international community can;t decide and agree on what to do. America has suggested to intervene but the evidence against this was, "I think foreign military intervention would probably be catastrophic, and to hear Americans suggest this is to think back what they did in Iraq and what an extraordinary catastrophe that has been." This provided a reasonable example of why the world shouldn't intervene yet the Syrians complain about not having help sent to them. 
       This conflict connects to the conflict in All But My Life because the conflict in the book is the holocaust. In the holocaust people were killed for what they believed in just as people are killed in Syria for what they believe in for their country. In both conflicts people were dehumanized and killed by people of their own country. Both conflicts are considered genocide. Also the world didn't intervene with the holocaust until much later and after many were killed. In the conflict in Syria, the world cant agree on if to help Syria while people die every day so the world stands back and watches just as it did in the holocaust. Another similarity of the conflict in Syria and the holocaust is how the people of they conflict turned on each other and how the governments turned on their people. In the holocaust, the German government was taken over and a dictator was put in charge. Under Hitler, the dictator of the holocaust, the genocide commenced and during it, people of the country were killed but its own people. In the conflict of Syria, a dictator overtook the government in Syria and is creating the issues but killing its people, and using the government to its advantage. These two conflicts are both deadly to everyone involved and are causing an international debate on how to handle it. These two conflicts are similar issues in different time periods.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Dear Gerda...

Dear Gerda,

       I don't know if i've ever told you this, but I wanted to thank you for staying with me. That day at Sosmowitz when you recieved a work card and could leave before we were sent to the camps. I will never know why you didn't leave and go with Abek's family. I don;t even know if it was for me or for some other reason you didn't want to tell me. Yet I will forever be grateful and always rememebr the act of friendship you showed me that day. I can't figure out why you didn't leave though. You had the chance to be free, well more free than you knew you would be at the camp. You could have escaped with Abek and lived a full life with him, even if you didn't feel the same way about him as he did for you. That day I secretly envyed you for your chance at freedom but I supported you and was happy for you. I wished for you to have a full life. However you didn't leave, and I will be ever in your debt. Whether you know it or not, you were my support and the quite possibly the reason for me not going insane. We should remain friends for as long as we live. I can't express how much I respect you and look up to you for all your bravery not only then but in life. I may never know if I would have done the same for you if the situation was reversed that day, but i'd like to think I would have the courage to do what you did that day; to stay with you and help you through this terribly frightening event. I hope you realize what an amazing friend and person you are and i will never forget what you did.
                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                      With Love,
                                                                                                                            Iles

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Stages of Genocide - All But My Life

In the first 54 pages of All But My Life, the stage of genocide shown is dehumanization. Dehumanization is when a group of people is looked upon as not human or below other people. This happens when the Jews in All But My Life, including Gerda and her friends and family are looked upon as equal to dogs. The event is when Gerda passes the factory on her way to visit Ilse with Mr. Pipersberg. When they got there, a sign was on the factory. The sign read, “DOGS AND JEWS NOT ALLOWED TO ENTER” (Klein, 1995, p.26). This sign shows that in the minds of many people, Jews and dogs are of the same level of humanity. This makes others believe that since Jews and dogs are alike, Jews are no longer human and such should not be treated like a human. Another event that shows dehumanization in All But My Life is when the rations for Jews are cut. After Christmas all rations for Jews were cut to less than half of those who were non-Jews. Also the word “JEW” was printed on the card determining that only Jews were targeted to have their rations cut. This shows that people are intentionally trying to weaken the Jews specifically. This shows dehumanization because it is treating Jews under what all other non-Jews receive in rations. Treating all Jews under everybody else is dehumanizing them.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Aid Agency

Child Soldiers International would be best for our student body to sent money for because of its effect on child soldiers around the world.Child Soldiers International works towards preventing the recruitment and use of children as soldiers and secures rehabilitation for child soldiers. Founded in 1998, created from the coalition of human rights and humanitarian organizations, Child Soldiers International was made to stop the use of children in armed combat. Working with the UN and globally effective, Child Soldiers International has worked in many countries around the world to stop and help the child soldiers being forced to fight. Currently Child Soldiers International is addressing the recruitment of child soldiers in 4 countries; Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Myanmar, and Thailand. There is also a campaign in the UK to finally make it so only people 18 years of age and older can join the military. This law is effective in many other countries including the US. As you can see Child Soldiers International is an effective, progressing, helpful force internationally that works to stop child soldiers.This makes Child Soldiers International the best option to send money for to be most effective in the world.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Who's To Blame?

I would blame the UN for Rwanda because even though they “tried” to “intervene” with the Rwandan genocide; they didn’t quite do all they could do to stop it. In all honesty, the UN could have tried a lot harder to stop the killing, but the countries had no true connection with Rwanda so no country belonging to the UN really wanted to stick their neck out for a country they didn’t really need. With all the killing, the effort the UN put forth to stop the genocide is very small and because the UN didn’t really have a need for Rwanda, they let it fall.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Defiance 12-01-11

If i were the editor of Defiance I would have the scene just about how it went in the movie. In my ethics i don't think they should have killed them but if i were in their position i probably wouldn't have killed him too. Letting him go free would be too risky for him to reveal their place and if i were in their position i would have a lot of anger built up towards Germans in general that i would probably kill him too.Obviously i don't think killing is right but in the moment, in my mind, i would probably have done what then did in the scene. I think the scene is a good representation of what i think would happen. They showed how the man was scared and how he had a family too but it also showed how they had families too but they were killed.My ethics now are i definitely don;t think killing is right or just in any situation, however if i were in their position, i can't guarantee that i wouldn't kill the man too. In the way i think now, i probably would kill him, just because of the way i handle anger and how it would come out all at once. Overall i would keep the scene how it is now because in my mind, that's how it would happened when it actually happened.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Defiance 11-30-11

The actions of Tuvia and the Jewish partisans are different than Zus and the Russian partisans. Tuvia and the Jewish partisans send out food scouts to go to a village and take food from people but they only steal from those who can afford to give it and not from those unable to. Zus and the Russian partisans ambush Germans and kill them. I believe both are understandable but i only believe Tuvia's actions are justifiable. Tuvia's actions are reasonable and are not as drastic as Zus's. As i said before, i don;t think killing is ever justifiable. I do believe the anger and hurt behind the actions of Zus are understandable but not justified. However Tuvia does what he needs to do to provide for his community. What Tuvia and Zus do are both against what the Germans want, they just go about it in different ways. The U.S. used some of the same tactics during the revolutionary war, but neither the U.S. or Tuvia/Zus's actions are justified. I think if what we do is justifiable depends on how you go about it. For example Tuvia goes about it in a peaceful, undercover, merciful way as opposed to Zus who kills everyone possible that is against him. In war time, circumstances do change but whether actions are justifiable or not does not change. Actions can be unjust but understandable. So even in war time, killing is not just.